Saturday, May 18, 2024

#1518 The I Word

 


…22And this righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no distinction, 23for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24and are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.… Romans 3: 23-24

9What then? Are we any better? Not at all. For we have already made the charge that Jews and Greeks alike are all under sin. 10As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one. 11There is no one who understands, no one who seeks God.… Romans 3: 9-11

Let's get a definition of inclusion that everyone has access to on the internet:

Inclusion is, by the Oxford Dictionary definition, 
  1. The act of including or being included within a group or structure.
  2. The practice or policy of providing equal access to opportunities or resources for people who otherwise might be excluded or marginalized, such as those who have physical or intellectual disabilities and members of other minority groups.
As I stated before in Diversity, I believe that we as human beings are made in the image of God, everyone, and I believe what the Bible says, and science now confirms, that we all come from the same common parentage. We have the greater in our common than we do in our differences. It is one race, the human race, and from that comes all manner of diversity, giftedness, different shades of melanin, even albinism, and ethnic, tribal or cultural diversity. The greater I would appeal to is our humanity, being made in the image of God, for we can find within the cultural, things that should not be defended, in that they go against the first order of being human. For example, and we gave this before, Hitler and Nazi Germany, a culture that I believe to be wrong and against the image of God in it's fellow creatures. Another example that I would not defend or protect would be cultures that do human sacrifice, groups that practice cannibalism, cultures that sexualize children or abuse them in other ways. It is not racist nor wicked to want to exclude such behaviors, quite the contrary. 

In the verses at the beginning of this we are all included, regardless of our opinions, regardless of geography or skin color, all have sinned, all fall short, no one is righteous of themselves. The outcome of that, what is owed to everyone in accordance to that commonality is this:

…22But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves to God, the fruit you reap leads to holiness, and the outcome is eternal life. 23For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6: 22-23

Now some will start pulling their hair out, and if they haven't already then here comes the Biblically exclusive statements about the answer to the inclusive statements above:

5“Lord,” said Thomas, “we do not know where You are going, so how can we know the way?” 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. 7If you had known Me, you would know My Father as well. From now on you do know Him and have seen Him.”… John 14: 5-7

Notice Jesus doesn't say "A way", like the coexist movement, no, He is "The Way", as in the only way, and "no one" comes to the Father, no one is made right with God by another way. We all belong to the group that needs Christ, needs something not found within us, but outside of us, provided for us. This angers many, but I believe the Creator has the right over His creation.

The Bible doesn't allow for there being your truth and my truth, Buddha, Mohammad, humanism, atheism (which is just like humanism), Jehovah's Witness, Mormonism, Roman Catholicism and Christianity etc. as all equal ways which come to the same end. I would argue that all but one reach the same end, and that is not an apostate form of Christianity, not a Christ that you made in your imagination, but the Christianity that trust not in self but Christ alone as your redemption from the wrath of a Holy and just God, Who being so, and being the eternal, infinite being, will be in the same capacity forever opposed to sin. It is this Christianity, marked by being born again, granted the grace of repentance, trusting in the sacrifice of Christ for the sin of which you are guilty, that is the way God provided. Now people get angry and say that isn't fair, like Cain they think God must accept my vegetables, and when they find he does not then they hate their brothers and sisters who believed and obeyed. They did not want God, did not want His way, His provision, and they even go so far as to say they don't need it because they do not accept His definition of sin. Some see themselves as righteous, some say there is no God, or if it is the God of the Bible then they are so smart and beyond the One Who created them, far more compassionate then Him, that they would choose to die in their sin with the hope that there is no God to answer to or that hell is not so bad as some preachers tend to think. Well, you are right, those preachers are finite beings with finite understanding, and so I would imagine that it is not as bad as they say, but rather far worse. 

1“Truly, truly, I tell you, whoever does not enter the sheepfold by the gate, but climbs in some other way, is a thief and a robber. 2But the one who enters by the gate is the shepherd of the sheep. 3The gatekeeper opens the gate for him, and the sheep listen for his voice. He calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.… John 10: 1-3

…7So He said to them again, “Truly, truly, I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep. 8All who came before Me were thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them. 9I am the gate. If anyone enters through Me, he will be saved. He will come in and go out and find pasture.… John 10: 7-9

…7to open the eyes of the blind, to bring prisoners out of the dungeon and those sitting in darkness out from the prison house. 8I am the LORD; that is My name! I will not yield My glory to another or My praise to idols. 9Behold, the former things have happened, and now I declare new things. Before they spring forth I proclaim them to you.”… Isaiah 42: 7-9

The prophet Isaiah spoke these things about Jesus 700 years before He arrived.

…5But He was pierced for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon Him, and by His stripes we are healed. 6We all like sheep have gone astray, each one has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid upon Him the iniquity of us all. 7He was oppressed and afflicted, yet He did not open His mouth. He was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so He did not open His mouth.… Isaiah 53: 5-7

So what about DEI? How does this all play out in the work world, the unstable world? As a Christian I believe that regardless of what you believe I still have to look across the table and see myself. I have hired and worked with people of all ethnicities, with the hypomelanistic, the hypermelanistic, atheists, cult followers, homosexuals and transgender. In fact, I would challenge anyone else's claims to inclusion, as I only favor things that are in accordance with the job. I include people that fly and stand under a host of banners, many of which I disagree with politically, religiously and morally, but all I ask is that they respect the rights of others to look different than them, their right to work and provide for themselves and their families. I ask that they also respect the rights of others to disagree, and to promote values that actually help at work, like attendance, job knowledge, experience, and work ethic. I disagree with people who lean towards and have openly stated in front of me, that, "I will pull the race card, the girl card,' or, 'I check off more boxes than you because I am gay, or transgender, or a cat that uses these pronouns." Yes, that is in quotes. As a Christian I believe you can not only disagree with me but even hate me and still I must see your value as one being made in the image of God. 

…19Do not avenge yourselves, beloved, but leave room for God’s wrath. For it is written: “Vengeance is Mine; I will repay, says the Lord.” 20On the contrary, “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him a drink. For in so doing, you will heap burning coals on his head.” 21Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.… Romans 12: 19-21

I do not agree with the concept I have seen with much of the DEI related talks and material, the concept of intersectionality. Calling CRT a theory is beyond a stretch as well. It is in no way inclusive to say that because you check off these boxes that you should not have a voice. It is in no way inclusive, and it is also outright and downright racist to say that because you check the box of whiteness, and then intersect with the sin of being heterosexual, top that off with being male, middle aged, and God forbid, Christian too, then you should not be able to talk about race or inclusion. The truth does not belong to any group based upon their color or sex. It is something that must be found, and must be able to stand on it's own, it is for those who love it, and it is colorless, blind and indifferent to our feelings. Regardless of your ethnicity you can only speak what you know, and to speak the truth you must know it, and yet some have recognized it but spoke other than the truth in order to deceive. But here is another inclusive statement regarding men and the truth:

…18Whoever believes in Him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe has already been condemned, because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19And this is the verdict: The Light has come into the world, but men loved the darkness rather than the Light because their deeds were evil. 20Everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come into the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.… John 3: 18-20

I recently listened to a Ted Talk where someone was discussing the topic of DEI and the ideas of "covering and authenticity". He went through a host of different groups who identified as covering, basically not being their authentic selves, not coming out if they were gay, bisexual, or even suppressing their hurt over perceived wrongs committed by people who said something that hurt their feelings. Some people even covered because they were white and that was not one of the supposedly marginalized groups, but they felt like they were being overlooked for promotions etc., because they were not in one of the groups recognized by intersectionality. Others hid their feelings he said because of the stoic position that men shouldn't cry or be that emotional. Some people hid that they felt sick or were struggling because they did not want to project weakness. I will not say that there is never racism involved in some peoples' decision making process, in fact, I would say most of the answers and knee jerks coming out of this DEI stuff is quite racist, and I refer you back to the two previous posts. But I would ask you this, if authenticity is important and when you come out as gay, and I tell you that you were never actually hiding it that well to begin with, what is it that you want from me? I am still going to treat you the same, expect the same work from you, expect the same respect from you, and I am still going to defend your personhood, but are you going to be inclusive of me if I don't agree with you? Let me put it to you like this, you tell me, "Calvin, I don't think that I can be myself around you because I haven't been authentic with you, I have been covering', and I say, 'speak up man or woman, spit it out." And you say, "I am gay, or I believe myself to be a woman trapped in a man's body, Calvin, what do you think?" Like I have tried to make clear all along, and this is my answer. When someone ask me a direct question I give them a direct answer, I tell them the truth. "My friend, I love you, and above you, I love the God Who made you but Who has also spoken on these very things. I believe Him to be eternal, so unchanging, not bound by time or mistakes, but sovereign overall and perfect. I will not change what He says regardless of governments or current cultural demands, no man has that right, and if I did tell you other than what He says then that would not be authentic on my part, and it would be the most unloving thing I could do to another human being. To tell you what you want to hear right now, to tell you that this is not sin, that God will not judge according to His word, that would cruel on my part, to believe in the God of the Bible, to know that there are eternal repercussions for sin, and then to tell you, don't worry about it, that is truly hateful. Now I ask you, is there room in your "inclusion" for me?" I go by what God says, and He has been very clear on all these things. Listen carefully, we are all under a time of great grace, where we are not under a Theocracy, that it is not do this and you shall live, as though the law can save, but these things are still considered sin and Christ will come back one day to judge. I ask that you read this and think about it, not for my sake, but yours.

…12If a man lies with his daughter-in-law, both must surely be put to death. They have acted perversely; their blood is upon them. 13If a man lies with a man as with a woman, they have both committed an abomination. They must surely be put to death; their blood is upon them. 14If a man marries both a woman and her mother, it is depraved. Both he and they must be burned in the fire, so that there will be no depravity among you.… Leviticus 20: 12-14

…4If you see your brother’s donkey or ox fallen on the road, you must not ignore it; you must help him lift it up. 5A woman must not wear men’s clothing, and a man must not wear women’s clothing, for whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD your God. 6If you come across a bird’s nest with chicks or eggs, either in a tree or on the ground along the road, and the mother is sitting on the chicks or eggs, you must not take the mother along with the young.… Deuteronomy 22: 4-6

…9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who submit to or perform homosexual acts, 10nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor verbal abusers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.… 1 Corinthians 6: 9-11

If you can see yourself in any of these verses, I know I can as someone who has been a fornicator, a liar, a gossip, a drug addict, a thief and rebellious towards my mom and God. If you can see yourself, see what God calls sin as sin and repent, He saves sinners. Herein is great hope for you.

…31Jesus answered, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. 32 I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.” Luke 5: 31-32

Below is a great link to Voddie Baucham teaching on Social Justice and the Gospel. I would encourage you to listen so that you are not stuck in a bubble about these things. Culture has a tendency towards sucking up which leads to everyone following the masses like in the Emperor's New Clothes. It is not healthy and it mistakenly attacks those who disagree and accuses them of being unloving because they prefer to tell the truth. Do I, as a Christian, believe we should make sure that people are included in our places of work, that they be respected as our equals, that they be able to work without harassment or bullying? Absolutely, and I have fought openly against those who have promoted hostile working conditions. I understand how people feel when treated like that because I have experienced it myself. I have epilepsy, and as new Christians me and my wife were at a job fair, she was waiting in the lounge area while I went back for an interview. I made it through the first part of the interview and was accepted, but I had listed my epilepsy on the sheet and when they noticed this, one of them went out into the lobby and told someone else, "we don't want this one, he has seizures." Well, my wife was out there with our new baby, and she is not shy about these things and told them, "you can't do that; it's discrimination." They back pedaled and gave me the job, but it was more than a little awkward showing up where people didn't want you, but I did, and I worked hard. I have had seizures at another place of work and HR ask me not to "come back till your doctor can say that you won't have another; you need to go on disability." I told them, "you can't do that, it's against the law, it's discrimination, and I will see you or a lawyer on Monday." They made some calls and then someone higher up said, see you Monday. I also learned as a Christian that I need to have some grace with them, and also as a father that I need to be more responsible about my condition, so I went back to a neurologist to see what had changed in the last 15 years, and they did some testing and I have now gone seizure free for over six years with my current treatments. I am a huge proponent of making work available to those who want to work, even if it means putting in a wheel chair ramp, elevator, or making special work benches to accommodate the handicapped. I love places like Publix where they give jobs to the mentally disabled, and it's exciting to see just how excited they are with being a part of something, contributing. My wife volunteers with a lady who has down syndrome and is about 70 some odd years old, and she gets great satisfaction being where the people are and seeing a job well done. So I think inclusion like that is important, but not without honesty, not without the truth, not excluding logic and reason. 






















































































































































































Monday, May 13, 2024

#1517 The E Word

 




“You shall not bear a false report; do not join your hand with a wicked man to be a malicious witness. 2 You shall not follow the masses in doing evil, nor shall you testify in a case so as to turn aside after the masses in order to cause justice to be turned aside; 3 nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his case.

4 “If you meet your enemy’s ox or his donkey wandering away, you shall surely return it to him. 5 If you see the donkey of one who hates you lying helpless under its load, you shall refrain from leaving it to him, you shall surely release it with him.

6 “You shall not cause the justice due to your needy brother to be turned aside in his case. 7 Keep far from a false charge, and do not kill the innocent or the righteous, for I will not justify the guilty.

8 “And you shall not take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the clear-sighted and subverts the cause of the just.

9 “And you shall not oppress a sojourner, since you yourselves know the soul of a sojourner, for you also were sojourners in the land of Egypt.
Judgments About Work and Rest

10 “Now you shall sow your land for six years and gather in its produce, 11 but on the seventh year you shall let it rest and lie fallow, so that the needy of your people may eat; and whatever they leave the beast of the field may eat. Thus you shall do with your vineyard and your olive grove.

12 “Six days you are to do your work, but on the seventh day you shall rest so that your ox and your donkey may rest, and the son of your maidservant, as well as your sojourner, may refresh themselves. 13 Now concerning everything which I have said to you, beware; and do not mention the name of other gods, nor let them be heard from your mouth. Exodus 23: 1-13 LSB

Define Equity:

Merriam-Webster definition of equity states in the positive that equity is a) justice according to natural law or right and in the negative b) freedom from bias or favoritism.

Oxford Languages definition of equity states it as: the quality of being fair and impartial.

The definitions above align with what you can read from the passage in Exodus 23, in verse 1 we see that justice should not be subverted by lying in order to get an outcome that favors you or another wicked man. Verse 2, justice should not be subverted by way of the crowd, numbers nor might make right. Our founding fathers realized that the majority can be wrong, like lynch mobs and rioters, and so they wrote a constitution. People confuse democracy with the power to vote to make something true that isn't or to call something just that never will be. Going along with the crowd may feel exciting, as movements often do, but numbers and momentum don't make something good or just, a tsunami is also a movement, but I wouldn't want to be in front of it. Verse 3 goes so far as to say that one should not be partial to a poor man in his case either, favor him because he is poor, that is not just. Verse 6 protects the needy as does 8 because it is the rich that can afford to pay bribes, but again, that is not justice, that is not equity. 

More on Exodus 23

…16Wash and cleanse yourselves. Remove your evil deeds from My sight. Stop doing evil! 17Learn to do right; seek justice and correct the oppressor. Defend the fatherless and plead the case of the widow.” 18“Come now, let us reason together,” says the LORD. “Though your sins are like scarlet, they will be as white as snow; though they are as red as crimson, they will become like wool.… Isaiah 1: 16-18

I see equity as I see equality, that we are all human beings, belonging to the human race, sharing the same parents. In this I believe that justice should not be meted out according to titles, melanin levels, wealth or lack of. We are all made in the image of God and so we should respect that image in every individual, regardless of whether they agree with us or not. In verse 17 of Isaiah 1, above, Isaiah, at the behest of the Holy Spirit, mentions two groups of people that also deserve justice, the fatherless and widow, people who do not have the power to repay us. James later echoes these same sentiments. 

…26If anyone considers himself religious and yet does not bridle his tongue, he deceives his heart and his religion is worthless. 27Pure and undefiled religion before our God and Father is this: to care for orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world. James 1: 26-27

For those who wonder at my use of Scripture, I have many good reasons to trust the Bible as a reliable source. Even the opening verse is a scientifically sound statement.

The words of Genesis 1:1 are precise and concise beyond mere human composition. They account for everything evolution cannot explain. Evolutionary philosopher Herbert Spencer, one of Darwin’s earliest and most enthusiastic advocates, outlined five “ultimate scientific ideas”: time, force, action, space, and matter.25 These are categories that (according to Spencer) comprise everything that is susceptible to scientific examination. That simple taxonomy, Spencer believed, encompasses all that truly exists in the universe. Everything that can be known or observed by science fits into one of those categories, Spencer claimed, and nothing can be truly said to “exist” outside of them. - Article adapted from a JMac lecture, Master's College.

In the beginning (Time), God (Force), created (Action), the heavens (Space), and the earth (Matter).

1In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2Now the earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.… Genesis 1: 1-2

When I wanted to be an atheist it was mostly appealing to me because I didn't like the idea of a just and Holy God. I loved my sin and I did not like that He called it such. But how from that ideology could I possibly address this present topic of equity, of justice without bias? If I eliminate God then men are no longer made in His image and no longer beholding to Him, a thought that I once found comforting. No God = no sin = no sin of inequity either. Think about it, if we are not designed by a Creator, Who would then have a right over His creation, which thought we can't bare because it would question our autonomy, then where is the basis of our complaint for equity, fairness, justice? If you and I are only a result of many accidents, if we came into being from nothing, unguided, not designed, well that bares a lot of questions in relation to Spencer's five "ultimate scientific ideas" as well, but where is the foundation of your demand for equity? What is your highest court of appeal?

One answer that I often get back is "society", we decide together as a society or by the standards of the present culture. Right and wrong are decided by society, a collective of individuals, by democratic vote and they are right based upon the light they have or don't have according to their time. The reality of that is that without God there is no ultimate right or wrong, so there is still no actual, fixed, absolute for any of these ideals except that it will be determined by men and women, and even then by power. Might makes right in this scenario either by numbers, weapons or technology. Another issue here is none of these things are free from the lies of politics, of cheating, but again you would have to be strong enough enforce even actual good, fairness. Good government would do just that. 

13Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to the king as the supreme authority, 14or to governors as those sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to praise those who do right. 15For it is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorance of foolish men.… 1 Peter 2: 13-15

Let's look at another outcome, can the majority not only beat the minority by vote, but also vote to exploit and or eradicate the minority? I submit to you Nazi Germany, and if society decides right and wrong, that society was on board with taking their weapons, their military might and power to push forward an ideology that killed Jews, homosexuals, and Christians who decided to hide and protect their neighbors. Read the story of Corrie ten Boom, The Hiding Place, and I would also challenge you to read about the Nuremburg Trials where the defense offered by men who oversaw the genocide of their fellow humans in gas chambers, firing lines, by starvation, rape and torture, was that they were simply following orders. They were just going with the power, with the movement, someone they found to be a dynamic speaker. The same with Mao Zedong, Stalin and Lenin; people liked what they had to say, and those people were willing to slaughter over a hundred million of their fellow humans in the name of the god of atheism. They all promised equity, but they bravely called it communism and socialism back then.


The indictment of 24 Nazi government officials and organizations was filed on October 18, 1945 by the four chief prosecutors of the International Military Tribunal: Robert H Jackson of the United States, Sir Hartley Shawcross of Great Britain, Francois de Menthon of France, and Roman A Rudenko of the Soviet Union. The jurisdiction of the Tribunal included crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The IMT defined crimes against humanity as "murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation...or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds." From The National WW2 Museum New Orleans



So when we talk about DEI today what are we talking about? I believe in equity of opportunity, that's the way I hire, I am looking for the candidate with the best credentials as relating to the job. Like I said before, this takes care of the natural available diversity as well. Once you go around this and make something aesthetic or cultural a requirement, you have actually perverted equity because you are unjust. I have heard arguments for equity that demand reparations, and they again choose melanin as the highest appeal to this. So, if you are a person of color living in America or Western Europe, you are owed reparations because you did not get as fair a shake at the American dream as people with less melanin. You are here because you, oh, well not you, but your ancestor, some centuries ago, was kidnapped and brought here to work against their will. This isn't new, and we all got to hear much about this in recent years from BLM and other groups that have had a lot of help from corrupt media, calling violent riots mostly peaceful protests and government that was mad about Jan. 6th, where the capitol police walked people through the capitol, but not so angry about fires, looting or the lynch mob that came against the capitol at the end of the previous administration and hurt police. There's another issue, we have seen that corruption is in all human groups, that the people that peddle equity often don't know what it is and are really bad with the money that they ask you turn over to them. We have government that promises entitlements (welfare programs), which has been a long standing experiment in equity, but what has it produced? People now teach their children that this is how you survive, rather than learning a real world skill they appeal to an artificial entity, the people that say vote for me and I will take what someone else has worked for and give it to you. Another issue, how far back are you willing to go? Who kidnapped and sold Africans to the Portuguese, the Spanish, and other Europeans, the answer, other Africans. What does the Bible have to say about this type of slavery? This is important because it and people influenced by it, like  Harriet Beecher Stowe, who was also influenced by the plight of African Americans that she witnessed, were moved to become abolitionist. 

16Whoever kidnaps another man must be put to death, whether he sells him or the man is found in his possession. Exodus 21:16

Now that passage was written to Israel in a Theocracy, but the abolitionist recognized that while there was forgiveness available through Christ, yet God did not change. It is still wrong to make someone else less than you in your eyes in order to take their freedom or live off the sweat of their brow, the bending of their back. Their appeal was to men being made in the image of God. It is also wrong to answer racism or supposed racism with racism. I say supposed because race baiters are a greedy lot that rely on racism one way or another. It's their bread and butter. They use it every voting cycle, vote for me because everyone else is racist, and I am going to save you. It gets them in power, they give out some money, but there is never enough "free money", so when their programs don't work they just slander their opponents more. They vote themselves raises, and when they budget poorly they just raise the taxes and there is no accountability. Ask yourselves when you vote for them, do I want true equity and equality, or do I want special treatment for something that has nothing to do with merit? These people are snake oil salesmen that need all of us to be at each other's throats, and will call truth hate speech as soon as someone disagrees with them. 

19Yet you may ask, ‘Why shouldn’t the son bear the iniquity of his father?’ Since the son has done what is just and right, carefully observing all My statutes, he will surely live. 20The soul who sins is the one who will die. A son will not bear the iniquity of his father, and a father will not bear the iniquity of his son. The righteousness of the righteous man will fall upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked man will fall upon him. 21But if the wicked man turns from all the sins he has committed, keeps all My statutes, and does what is just and right, he will surely live; he will not die.… Ezekiel 18: 19-21

In reality the greatest threat to this nation is the government, the government. And I want to show you how we are to understand that. Turn to Romans 13, Romans 13. Listen carefully to what the apostle Paul said: “Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it doesn’t bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil.” The role of the government is to restrain evil; and when it functions to restrain evil, it is fulfilling its God-ordained purpose.

Please notice in verses 1 and 2 that government is from God, by God, of God. It is designed as a necessary restraint in a world of sinners. Verses 3 and 4 tell us it is not a threat to those whose behavior is good, but evil. It is those who do evil who should be afraid, not those who do good. In fact it offers praise to those who do good, and brings wrath on those who do evil. And rulers actually, according to verse 6, are servants of God, devoted to that service.

This is God’s design for government. The problem is, when government ceases to function by God’s design, it yields up its authority. The same would be true in a family. God’s design is that the father lead the family. When the father leads in a destructive and evil way, he yields up the right to exercise that God-given authority.

And by the way just as a footnote, the man who wrote that, the apostle Paul, was in violation of the government more often than any other person in the entire New Testament. And when he went to preach the gospel, he was very often thrown in jail; and ultimately he was executed by the government that he refused to obey when it no longer functioned to protect good behavior and punish evil behavior.

A second passage, 1 Peter chapter 2, and verses 13 and 14 will suffice, I think: “Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, or to governors as sent by him”—by the Lord—“for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right.” There again we are to submit for the Lord’s sake. “What do you mean ‘the Lord’s sake’?” When the government is doing what the Lord designed it to do.

When government turns the divine design on its head and protects those who do evil and makes those who do good afraid, it forfeits its divine purpose. In our world today rulers are designing a culture that protects the immoral. It even has reached the point where it desires to protect criminals, and makes those who do good afraid. When the criminals are unrestrained because they don’t fear the consequences, but the police are restrained because they fear the consequences of stopping criminals, you know everything is turned on its head. Our government is the source of lies and the protector of liars, and the enemy of those who speak the truth. It praises the evil and persecutes the good.

So God’s design for government has been entirely corrupted. As these divinely designed spheres of control in human society descend into chaos, the government will cease to function the way God designed it, and in fact it will become the enemy of the divine design. It will turn everything upside down. It will become the punisher of those who do good, like putting James Coates in prison for preaching but letting rioters go free. J Mac from When Government Rewards Evil and Punishes Good

Some final Scriptures relating to equity, and as a Christian you should want to pay fairly just as much as you do not want to be taken advantage of. I have been on the bad side of that before, where I paid a lot of money and the person did inferior work, and even claimed to be a Christian. I would ask that those people quit saying that, and at the same time, if they do good, then I would like to reward them even above what we agreed. To me, equity comes down to treating others as equal to you and desiring that they do well. Think about what equity really is, what are you actually seeking? What are you wanting to make the deciding factor of who gets what? If it's your melanin levels, that has nothing to do with equity, you're just asking for another type of racism. If you want your sex to open the door for you then that's just sexist, but if you want to do what's right and just in God's eyes, even loving and praying for your enemies, that's divine. 

17Elders who lead effectively are worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. 18For the Scripture says, Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain,” and, “The worker is worthy of his wages.” 1 Timothy 5: 17-18

…9Not that we lack this right, but we wanted to offer ourselves as an example for you to imitate. 10For even while we were with you, we gave you this command: “If anyone is unwilling to work, he shall not eat.” 11Yet we hear that some of you are leading undisciplined lives and accomplishing nothing but being busybodies.… 2 Thessalonians 3: 9-11













































































































































Thursday, May 9, 2024

#1516 The D Word

 


…25God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that crawls upon the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 26Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness, to rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it.” 27So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.…Genesis 1: 25-27

…19By the sweat of your brow you will eat your bread, until you return to the ground—because out of it were you taken. For dust you are, and to dust you shall return.” 20And Adam named his wife Eve, because she would be the mother of all the living. Genesis 3: 19-20


I believe the Bible to be God's word, and so as a Christian, a follower of Christ, Who was the Word become flesh to dwell among us, I take my world view from here. As far as diversity goes, I believe, according to Scripture, that every human being comes from Adam and Eve. Even modern science, though much slower than the Bible, would agree that all humans have a shared common parentage, not races, but rather the human race. We are all related to one another, and so racism is a foolish concept. We are all made in the image of God, and so therein is the ultimate premise for equality. In the corporate world, as far as hiring, I have never had to worry about diversity and inclusion because I don't hire those traits. I hire for skill, experience, and where I can detect it, integrity. Once you are hired then my job shifts to behaviors, does he or she come in as scheduled, on time? Do they get along with the other employees and treat them with respect? Do they do their work? Are they lazy? etc. 

In recent years, and I find it unfortunate, there has been much talk about DEI, CRT and other programs that take the focus off of the actual job, it's genuine requirements, and focus on things like melanin levels, and or sexual preferences, which should not keep someone from having a job in the corporation, but should also not give preferential treatment or means to bypass legitimate qualifications. I will give you a real world example:

We had a board of 5 individuals, including myself, and we were interviewing people for a position in a new area. We had finished interviewing 3 gentlemen and were now interviewing a young lady. She was a wonderful person, very polite, easy to get along with, but she was struggling with the questions relating to the job. We take notes during these interviews and at the end we all vote, and we had agreed to a process where everyone had to be unanimous or we moved to the next individual or asked for another interview. We voted and I was the only no vote, the only one that didn't agree to hire her for that position. Someone even went so far as to call me sexist. So I asked them, why, after interviewing 3 other people, who all answered the technical questions better, (one I disqualified for a behavioral issue, but 2 others were better interviews with experience that aligned better with the job), are we passing on them and picking her? One of my peers answered, "because I think diversity and inclusion are important." I asked him, "so you are going to hire her because she's a girl?" He restated, "I think diversity is important." They all held to this and patted themselves on the back like they had made some great moral stand, but in actuality they had done the opposite of what they were congratulating themselves for. You see, if you tell me to hire someone because they are a girl, then that is patently sexist, and if you tell me to hire someone because they are hypomelanistic or hypermelanistic then that is the clinical definition of racist. The story with that girl didn't end there though, my colleagues offered her the job, she accepted, but then later declined. Her reasoning? In her own words she declined because she was "not qualified"  for the position. In their race to score social brownie points on the latest snake oil chart, my colleagues had stooped to being dishonest and unprofessional, but the young lady told the truth. I told my bosses and peers that I would like to hire her now, and they asked why? I said, "because she's more honest than you, and I could train her to do the hiring with me and probably build a much better team." They rolled their eyes and moved on probably learning nothing, but this has been a problem with many of these programs. They are all based on racism or sexism or whatever ism of the week as being the issue as to why there are so few girls, people of color, gay people, etc. in the particular positions that are being discussed. The snake oil salesmen require these conditions in order for you to buy the treatment that they are selling for it. They never ask, "how many of the people that apply are female?" I can say that from my own experience it's probably in the neighborhood of 1 in 50 for the tech positions, maybe less that were female. That is changing in more recent years with apprentice programs, but those are the odds, and so it's far more likely that I will hire a male statistically, just from those numbers. I am looking for the best person for the job, most qualified, best team player, most experienced, and that has nothing to do with gender, race or sexual orientation. The snake oil salesman can't make his money that way though, but when you break down his program it almost always, without exception, makes racism the answer to racism, sexism the answer to sexism and so on. 

Here's an article by a very good, rational Economist, Walter E. Williams, and if anything I hope it just causes people to think rather than knee jerk and band wagon. I will continue with Equity in the next post.


by Walter E. Williams

Recently by Walter E. Williams: Department of Injustice

The terms affirmative action, equal representation, preferential treatment and quotas just don’t sell well. The intellectual elite and their media, government and corporate enthusiasts have come up with diversity, a seemingly benign term that’s a cover for racially discriminatory policy. They call for college campuses, corporate offices and government agencies to “look like America.”

Part of looking like America means if blacks are 13 percent of the population, they should be 13 percent of college students and professors, corporate managers and government employees. Behind this vision of justice is the silly notion that but for the fact of discrimination, we’d be distributed equally by race across incomes, education, occupations and other outcomes. There is absolutely no evidence that statistical proportionality is the norm anywhere on Earth; however, much of our thinking, laws and public policy is based upon proportionality being the norm. Let’s look at some racial differences whilst thinking about their causes and possible remedies.


While 13 percent of our population, blacks are 80 percent of professional basketball players and 65 percent of professional football players and are the highest paid players in both sports. By contrast, blacks are only 2 percent of NHL’s professional ice hockey players. There is no racial diversity in basketball, football and ice hockey. They come nowhere close to “looking like America.”

Even in terms of sports achievement, racial diversity is absent. Four out of the five highest career home-run hitters were black. Since blacks entered the major leagues, of the eight times more than 100 bases were stolen in a season, all were by blacks.


The U.S. Department of Justice recently ordered Dayton, Ohio’s police department to lower its written exam passing scores so as to have more blacks on its police force. What should Attorney General Eric Holder do about the lack of diversity in sports? Why don’t the intellectual elite protest? Could it be that the owners of these multi-billion-dollar professional basketball, football and baseball teams are pro-black while those of the NHL and major industries are racists unwilling to put blacks in highly paid positions?

There’s one ethnic diversity issue completely swept under the rug. Jewish Americans are less than 3 percent of our population and only two-tenths of 1 percent of the world’s population. Yet between 1901 and 2010, Jews were 35 percent of American Nobel Laureate winners and 22 percent of the world’s.

If the diversity gang sees underrepresentation as “probative” of racial discrimination, what do they propose we do about overrepresentation? Because if one race is overrepresented, it might mean they’re taking away what rightfully belongs to another race.

There are other representation issues to which we might give some attention with an eye to corrective public policy. Asians routinely get the highest scores on the math portion of the SAT while blacks get the lowest. Men are 50 percent of the population and so are women; yet men are struck by lightning six times as often as women. The population statistics for South Dakota, Iowa, Maine, Montana and Vermont show that not even 1 percent of their populations is black. On the other hand, in states such as Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi, blacks are overrepresented in terms of their percentages in the general population.

There are many international examples of disproportionality. For example, during the 1960s, the Chinese minority in Malaysia received more university degrees than the Malay majority – including 400 engineering degrees compared with four for the Malays, even though Malays dominate the country politically. In Brazil’s state of Sao Paulo, more than two-thirds of the potatoes and 90 percent of the tomatoes produced were produced by people of Japanese ancestry.

The bottom line is there no evidence anywhere that but for discrimination, people would be divided according to their percentages in the population in any activity. Diversity is an elitist term used to give respectability to acts and policy that would otherwise be deemed as racism.

Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics at George Mason University, and a nationally syndicated columnist. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page.

…27For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise.… Galatians 3: 27-29